Introduction
The foundation for a core documentary, two leading experts,
are sounding an urgent call to reimagine the American education so as to equip
the students to embrace the realities of the twenty-first-century economy. Tony
Wagner and Ted Dintersmith, the authors of “Most Likely to Succeed” want us to
stop thinking that success for our children is based on the test scores, but
instead start concentrating on actual learning, creative problem-solving, as
well as the joy of discovery. Also instead of merely troubleshooting the
challenges of our education system, the authors also provide a solution in the
form of a fully re-imagining of what a high-quality education for all should
look like. This book Most Likely to Succeed is very useful for everyone
concerned about the success of our children in this 21st century. The book
conveys this urgency while providing an inspiring perception of what the
students, and teachers, need to do under the right conditions. This paper
provides a detailed review of the book.
Discussion
This book is another very important one about success. This
time it is not grit that is key for success for the children. It is also not
even having a Tiger Mom or allowing the children walk home alone or letting
them skin their knees that can make them thrive in this twenty fist century
according to Wagner and Dintersmith. Also, it is not about supporting the
children’s spiritual development or doing away with the gluten in their diets
or even teaching them about the essence of team sports or white privilege. No,
this new and bestselling book focused on the heart of parental anxiety by
Wagner and Dintersmith embodies a detailed argument that the only way to make
sure that there is future security for our kids is to completely upend the
education system and reevaluate the purpose of schooling.
Wagner and Dintersmith’s incisive article slices via the
politics to signify, without pointing fingers how the schools should refocus
their attention to prepare the kids for their future jobs. The book offers a searing and urgent
indictment of the current damaging priorities of the American education system
and a fully grounded as well as a practical vision of how to re-imagine the
system for the world in which we live now. The authors use plain language to tell
it the way it is and how it ought to be if the American students, civil, and
economic democracy are to survive and thrive in the 21st century. They cut
through the noise as they demonstrate how the America’s education system should
transit from a myopic focus on the high-stakes testing to focus more on
preparing the students holistically for life, college, citizenship, and career.
The authors call for systemic changes in the education
system to make sure that the teachers are provided with the time and right
tools as well as the trust they need to empower children with a passion for
learning as they also teach critical skills the students require in the
twenty-first century economy. Their
claim is that today, more than ever, academic achievement is being prized thus
pressuring the kids to get into good colleges and attain the highest GPAs and
even pursue advanced degrees. But, while these students graduate with
credentials they lack the competencies that are required to be thoughtful, to
get good jobs and deliver a workforce for a nonexistent world, and be engaged
citizens. They say that America’s
methods of schooling have crushed the creativity as well as the initiative the
young people require to flourish in the twenty-first century.
The authors, who are also technology experts often use the
word “disrupt” to argue about how the
new revolution of the education system should affect the current system that is
relevant for the 19th century that is already past. Wagner works at the
innovation lab in Harvard’s Innovation whereas Dintersmith in a venture capital
that funds education and technology start-ups. Their argument is this: the
public education system in America only focuses on antiquated late nineteenth
century aspects, on the necessity “to educate several immigrants and refugees
working in farms for basic citizenship as well as for jobs in the industrial
economy.” according to these authors, most of the stuff the teachers force
children to know, that also form the basis of our culture’s sense of achievement
are unnecessary in this age of Internet of things and Google.
Wagner and Dintersmith say that tests and test-makers are
still running the show of the education system, and ten children are required
to “jump via the hoops” as they repeatedly drill to assimilate reams of content
or facts rather than learning the skills that will help them find employment or
be employable for years to come, meaning, the skills to make them
entrepreneurs. The nation has dedicated a modest amount of attention to the schools
and their purpose, but that is not being done based on the evolution that is
taking place in the area of technology. The authors say that education must
help the students to build a soul after teaching children to think. They also add that the ultimate goal of
education if to erect the cathedral of knowledge and wisdom and not just about
getting a big paycheck.
After the revolution imagined by Wagner and Dintersmith, the
college will no longer be a scandalous and expensive universal requirement, but
it will be an option for students who are the most academically minded. These
technology gurus propose an overhaul of the current SAT scoring system whereby
the adolescents are being sorted into various categories of collegiate
preparedness that they say, “In Good Shape,” “It Will Not Be Easy” and “Think
Different.” They say that the ones in the last two categories can be satisfied,
and even better served, by opting for vocational training or in free/low-cost
apprenticeships. The ill-formed perceptions of our culture that it is the
students who excel in school and graduate from the top colleges who are most
likely to succeed in their lives and workplace should be done away with.
According to the authors, it is clear that American
education has been overemphasizing on test scores and grade-point averages
while ignoring the deep curiosity as well as creativity that is the foundation
of real learning. The authors suggest many disruptions that should take place
in the current education system in America. Those disruptions include an
interdisciplinary approach; a hands-on or practical, project-based learning;
and student-directed curriculums that have already been implemented in some of
the best schools in the country. I think that their assumption that undergirds
the whole story that everyone can or must be molded into an entrepreneur is not
as convincing. I think that it is not
possible to model everybody into an entrepreneur but everybody can succeed in
life even though they were not so good in class. And also, an entrepreneurial set mind is not
the key to success.
The book is also supported with real-life examples of
inspiring cases, such as the one that describes a young woman known as Rebecca,
who, while she was in high school, she neglected her A.P. classes to work on a
research project and later also ditched Harvard to open her company. They quote Rebecca’s statement that “If we
can reach children earlier, “maybe we could be having hundreds of people who
could be entrepreneurs in their early 20s.” This t together with many other
cases form their basis of the argument that imparting entrepreneurial skills in
a kid while she is young can help the kid to grow up with a success-oriented
mind. They, however, say that this cannot be achieved by using the old-fashioned
teaching techniques of the nineteenth century that are in play in the current
education system.
The authors also say that the current employers emphasize
on, and are obsessed with the credentials even when they are increasingly
becoming irrelevant in light of real-world employment. Perhaps the credentials are being sued
because they are the tangible and they are what the country has utilized for a
long time basically to determine who is smart and who is not. What is being
experienced however in the world of business where the focus is on results and
outcomes is a quick transition from the conventional academic credentials to
finding better ways of assessing the core competencies of the applicants. The
authors also write about the Y Combinator as a way of moving away from the
credentials to the more skills-based assessment of one’s suitability for the
job. According to them, this transition from false credentials to more genuine
competencies that cannot only be observed but also assessed is the most crucial
move we are witnessing in the workplace.
They claim that this is what is likely to transform education.
Thus, the authors have an outcry for the transformation of
the education system so that it is more relevant to the needs of today’s
era. As they say, gone are the summer
holidays and the civics yore lectures in the scenarios when the students could
attack meaningful and engaging challenges as they form their points of view.
The authors use bullet lists, screened boxes, charts, and tables to provide a
convincing argument that the education system in American is really in a mess
and there should be a retooling of parts of the system
Conclusion
Most Likely to Succeed book presents a new vision of the
American education system, one that puts creativity and initiative at the
center of the learning process and also prepares children for today’s economy.
The book provides the parents and educators with a fundamental guide to getting
the best from their kids and a roadmap for opinion leaders and policymakers.
The issue the authors have determined is a real one, although there is no
single system can work for everyone, and the authors presume that Rebecca or
Bill Gates or Steve Jobs (or Wagner or Dintersmith) are the ultimate desirable
models of success. This leaves whole classrooms with gifted memorizers as well
as regular humans who never aspired to be or can never even be a Bill Gates.
Although it does not offer a clear roadmap on how to go in making every child
become an entrepreneur, the book is a commendable prose for the teachers and
policy makers in the education system, and I think that if implemented it can
improve the education system by a great deal.
References
Tony, W., & Ted, D. (2015). Most likely to succeed: Preparing our kids
for the innovation
era.
Washington, DC: Simon and Schuster.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in online nursing papers if you need a similar paper you can place your order from medical essay writing service online.
No comments:
Post a Comment