Many challenges face movement from an institutional
environment into the community. The Agency for Independent Living is a
non-profit agency. We are going to base our proposed Transitional House for the
Disabled on the agency. Our proposal needs a start up program budget of $280,600.
We are going to move the disabled from an institutional living perspective to a
community living perspective using services and opportunities available in the
community. The disabled will get rehabilitated at the Transitional House.
Movement to the House will empower the individuals to make informed decisions
thereby having more control of their lives (Allen, 2011)
Potential community partnerships
John Fredrick Family
Foundation
7618
Market Street Suite 876
Chicago,
IL 11941
Contact:
Mrs. Patricia Jones, Secretary
Interested
areas: Elderly, Hospital, Social services, women center and services
Grant
range: $2,000-$12,000
|
Me for You Foundation
Four
Theater Square, Suite 811
Rockford,
IL 9735-8765
Contact:
Ms. Judy Lee, CEO & President
Interested
areas: Social services, youth development, aging centers, women centers and
services
Grant
range: $25,000-$500,000
|
Chicago Foundation
P.O.
Box 6512
Champaign,
IL 87380
Contact:
Mr. Steve James
Interested
Areas: Cerebral palsy, mentally and physically disabled
Grant
range: $4, 000-$16,000
|
Buffalo Charitable
Trust Foundation
8909
Sports Avenue, Suite 7699
Aurora,
IL
Interested
areas: Physically disabled, visually impaired, goodwill industries
Grant
range: $4,000-$25,00
|
Problem statement
The agency would like disabled people to live in a
community where there is real support as opposed to nursing homes. Both young
and old disabled have wanted more choices other than nursing homes. Our agency
has a strong bias to the institutional care system. Most of the states that
receive Medicaid have nursing home services, but community-based services are
not compulsory. Most of the Medicaid long-term care money caters for
institutional services while the remaining is left to cover community-based
optional programs (Jetha, 2015)
There is the likeliness of more cases of disabled
homelessness if the current ways of institutionalization do not get reformed.
There are disabled individuals who are running away from total dependency and
are not ready to live in sheltered, segregated, and skilled nursing homes. They
are likely to get depressed in the nursing homes if they have ambitions. The
parties may want freedom to engage in drugs, and it is likely that the moment
they are on their own they will stop taking their prescribed drugs. After a
while, they will lose contacts with the social security. The disorganization
may be too much to enable them abandon street life.
There is a family crisis where a disabled individual gets
forced into nursing homes without their wish. The forceful admittance into
nursing homes can get attributed to lack of funds to start programs and
inadequate low-income housing. There are more problems when individuals have no
qualifications for social security benefits. Such individuals, therefore, have
to remain institutionalized. The problem deteriorates when institutional
programs have limitations in their budgets thereby eliminating more qualified
people from getting the services. This proposal is going to work due to the
following reasons (Priestly, 2001)
·
The disabled will gain full autonomy of
their lives
·
The disabled will have full exercise of
their independence
·
The individuals will get freed from
oppression
·
It will complement the services already
in place
·
The disabled need other programs besides
institutions
·
The Supreme Court has mandated the
Olmstead Act
Goals and objectives
The primary goal of the agency is moving disabled from
institution to a transitional house. We will have two houses housing six
individuals each. The agency will also offer basic educational skills that will
enable them cope with basic chores. The long-term goal is eliminating
institutionalization (McQuillan, 1974)
Project activities
All individuals in the transitional house will work
alongside a house social worker and interns. The social worker will help the in
establishing medical benefits and monthly budgeting and banking. The residents
will get medical care from their personal doctors. However, the house will
employ a nurse on a regular basis while supporting them with supportive
services.
The House will rely heavily on volunteers in meal
preparation. Their progress will get evaluated every six months by the social
worker in collaboration with the nurse. The residents will have weekends for
personal shopping with help from the social worker and student intern. The
emergency alert system will get installed to alert on the occurrence of any
emergency. All the resident services will aim at instructing them to become
self-sufficient (Roulstone & Hwang, 2015)
Yearly budget
State
Grants
|
$0.00
|
Extra
funding
·
Fundraising
·
Donations
|
$0.00
$0.00
|
Salaries
·
Two social workers
·
Registered nurse
·
Two certified nurse assistance
·
In-house supportive service
·
Social worker student interns
·
Volunteer visitor
|
$57,600
$48,000
$38,400
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
|
Placement
·
Bills, alarm, and restructuring
·
Recreation room
·
Bedrooms
·
Bathrooms
|
$60,700
$4,000
$5,000
$3,500
|
Insurance
|
$11,400
|
Transportation
|
$28,000
|
Durable medical equipments
·
Four wheelchairs
·
Four Hoyer lifts
·
Four transfer shower benches
|
$3,000
$3,000
$1,000
|
Extra things
·
Four computers
·
Office equipment
|
$12,000
$5,000
|
Total yearly budget
|
$280,600
|
The group process
Our group process was very successful. We did not
experience conflict between member or communication failures. We decided what
our proposal would be and went through the components of the proposal while
assigning each component to each member of the group according to the ability.
We would reach each one of the members through email or the telephone. The
group consisted of the following members
Name
|
Responsibilities
|
Patricia Jones
|
·
Organize the group process
|
Jonathan Gell
|
·
Research and give a list of potential
partners
·
Summarize the proposal
|
Steve James
|
·
Needs statement
·
Develop target group
·
Find the cause of the problem
·
Research on the cost of the
problem
|
David Kilburn
|
·
Project description (Goals and
objectives)
·
Develop a time chart
|
Veronica Rodriguez
|
·
Responsible for current barriers
·
Develop ways to evaluate the
program
|
Alexander Lee
|
·
Research and develop budget
breakdown (Personal cost, operational cost, budget summary)
|
The
group would meet to talk about the progress and deal with various questions
from the group on Thursday. The group decided to email the information to
Patricia Jones in the next one week so she could compose the draft and email us
the copies. In the following weeks, we made necessary changes in the draft proposal
in readiness for presentation. We were now ready to present our fund proposal.
Works
Cited
Allen, J. E. (2011). Nursing Home Administration,
6th Edition. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Jetha, A. (2015). The
Impact of Arthritis on the Early Employment Experience of Young Adults: A Literature Review. Disability
and Health Journal .
McQuillan, F. L.
(1974). Fundamentals of Nursing Home Administration. Detroit: Saunders.
Priestly, M. (2001). Disability
and the Life Course: Global Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roulstone, A., &
Hwang, S. K. (2015). Disabled People, Choices and Collective Organization: Examining the Potential of Cooperatives in
Future Social Support. Taylor and Francis ,
849-864.
No comments:
Post a Comment