Introduction
Like many multinational
corporations, Apple Inc manufactures many of its products primarily overseas,
in places such as China, Taiwan, Singapore, the Philippines, and Thailand
Compared to the United States. Even though many of these countries have labor
laws in place, their laxity can rebound on the company in adverse ways. For example, there were serious allegations
of employee working conditions in at Foxconn, one of its Chinese manufacturers
in the year 2006. The allegations
included longer working hours of 15-hours per day and overcrowded and ill-
equipped residents for employees. After thorough investigations, the company
found that the claims had merit. Accordingly, Apple Inc has made tremendous
steps towards high standards of environmental responsibility, social
responsibility, and ethical conduct. Apple’s suppliers are required to follow
the guidelines and responsible practices whenever they make products or provide
services for the company.
Apple’s supplier code of conduct goes beyond
mere compliance with the law by drawing upon internationally recognized
standards to advance environmental and social responsibility. When differences
arise between legal requirements and standards, the stricter standards are
expected to apply in compliance with applicable law. Supplier’s compliance is
assessed, and the violations may jeopardize business relationships to the
extent of termination. In addition to maintaining standards, the company has
regularly made changes in the past detailing its expectations for suppliers
regarding health and safety, labor and human rights, ethics, environmental
protection and management practices. This paper lists and explains various
changes that the company has made to its Code of Conduct in recent years for
suppliers providing goods or services to Apple Inc, or for use in or with Apple
products. (Moren, 2010)
Environmental standards
Apple Inc has vigorously enforced
its environmental standards across its supply chain. The company has
implemented various programs such as Clean Water Program and EHS Academy. The
clean water program promotes saving half a billion gallons of freshwater. The
EHS Academy educates managers and suppliers to preserve diligently and protect
the planet’s resources for future generations. Apple Inc conducted 451 audits
of its suppliers in 2013. This accounted for more than 51% audits conducted in
the year 2012. The two specialized types
of audits conducted were specialized environmental audits and process safety
assessment. One of the Environmental practices that came under scrutiny in the
audit report particularly focused on conflict minerals. (Moren, 2014)
Apple Inc now requires all smelters
of tantalum in its supply chain to be recognized as conflict-free by
third-party auditors. Similar steps have been taken to suppliers of other
minerals included in the manufacture of Apple products such as tungsten, tin,
and gold. Additionally, the Company released
a list of refiners and smelters that it uses together with their verification
status. The goal of the stricter
measures is to improve the accountability of its smelters and provide
information for its stakeholders. (Moren, 2014)
The company’s measures have
increased suppliers’ transparency and how they conduct business with the
company. Apple Inc has in the past increasingly pushed suppliers to remove
hazardous materials from products and afford more renewable energy for data
centers in order to reduce the use of conflict minerals. For example, the
company began investigating the potential associated environmental impacts and
human rights of using certain minerals like tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold in
2009. In 2010, Apple Inc mapped its supply chains down to the level of refiners
and smelters. The Consumer Electronics Company
has been instrumental in mapping its suppliers so as to exert its collective
influence to build devices that meet environmental standards. (Moren, 2010)
Labor and human rights
Apple Inc continually strengthens suppliers’
code of conduct to help implement safer and more ethical working conditions.
Apple Company looks at the code of conduct violation by conducting audits to
improve working conditions. The company actively looks for issues and fixes
them. For example, in 2014, 633 supplier audits were conducted in 19 countries
as an activity in Supplier Responsibility initiative. Audits are conducted by
Apple auditors and supported by various third-party auditors. The third parties
auditors are experts in their fields and are trained to use detailed auditing
protocols. Suppliers are graded on more than 100 data points during each audit
corresponding to each category of the company’s Supplier Code of Conduct. (Apple,
2015)
The audits are conducted up and down
its supply chain starting from component suppliers that produce hard drives,
screens, cases, and other Mac components, as well as other products such as
keyboards and displays and nonproduction suppliers, all the way up to final
assembly manufacturers. Additionally, Apple Inc was the first electronics firm
to engage directly with Indonesian smelters towards improving working
conditions. To further push for solutions, the firm spearheaded the
establishment of the Tin Working Group in the year 2013. The company along other stakeholders held
in-person meetings with more than 30 Indonesian tin traders and smelters and
government officials and throughout 2013 and 2014 to establish a foundation and
relationships to implement a possible system to enable the tracing of tin back
to legal mines and testing out new land management practices. (Apple, 2015)
According to the annual reports, the
company Apple Records supplier compliance with labor and human rights
practices, environmental impact practices, ethics practices, health and safety
practices, management commitment practices. It considers some problems as a
core violation when they directly contradict Apple's Supplier Code of Conduct.
Such violations include underage or involuntary labor, abuse, threats or
intimidating practices against employees, falsified audit materials and serious
environmental threats. Such facilities found directly violating the codes of
conduct are placed on probation for a year pending further audits at the end of
the period. Thus, every supplier conducting business with Apple is required to
demonstrate the highest commitment to protecting employees’ rights. Such
includes abiding by a maximum 60-hour workweek. In 2014 alone, 92% percent of
all our suppliers were compliant. (Apple, 2015)
For example, in 2014, the most
common violations found among suppliers concerned improper calculation of
overtime, excessive working hours, deficient benefits, pay below minimum wages,
discrimination, poor ergonomics, unsafe working conditions and negative
environmental impact. Beyond the carrying out of audits, the company holds
suppliers answerable with a periodical evaluation of Key Performance
Indicators, which comprise measurements of injuries, training, and living
conditions. The company makes procurement decisions in part on the basis in
part on key indicators. (Apple, 2015)
The strict measures are taken as an
oversight for the suppliers due to various incidents involving employees.
Example, in 2009, reports on suicide by a Foxconn employee reportedly after
losing a prototype of a new iPhone hit the headlines allegedly after being
abused by Foxconn security personnel. It became clear that the company had to
increase oversight as long as it is outsourcing products from countries that
lack the same kinds of oversight as the United States. (Moren, 2014)
A Corrective Action Plan is required
for every supplier in order to remediate all violations. The corrective action
plan outlining a corrective course of action must be submitted within two weeks
of the audit. Severe violations
adversely affect the suppliers’ business relationship with the company that may
result in possible termination. The supplier is then monitored by a team of
verification specialists who check in intervals ensure the supplier is on
track. A delay in progress is escalated to senior management. (Moren, 2014)
Worker’s Protection
Apple Inc has also instituted
changes to improve the ways its suppliers manage and recruit foreign workers.
In particular, the company has required limiting of recruitment fees, which
such employees are needed to pay to various labor agencies. Despite the fact
that such fees are legal; the firm has set a ceiling on them equal to a month's
net pay. In 2014, the firm helped 4500 foreign contract employees recoup
US$3.96 million in excessive amounts paid to labor brokers. The move is meant to control the practice.
Another example is that of Apple Inc partnering with three firms as well as
other groups such as trade unions and nongovernmental organizations to commence
a pilot program that would improve the management of foreign contract workers
working in Malaysian companies. The program also provides employees with
education on relevant laws and their rights as well as cultural orientation
and. According to the firm, such processes learned from that experience will be
extended to the other suppliers. (Apple, 2015)
References
Moren, D. (2010). Apple cleans up
its supply chain. Macworld, 27(5), 14-15.
Apple Inc (2015) Supplier
Responsibility: 2015 progress report
Moren, D. (2014) Apple's 2014
supplier report: Better working conditions
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in custom essay paper writing if you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom research paper services.
No comments:
Post a Comment