Questions
1. The theoretical foundations of qualitative
and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both
methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and
reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of
methods in a nursing study? Support your answer with current evidence-based
literature
The major purpose of conducting research is to identify
new information about an aspect in the nursing field. Thus, nursing research
has become an important skill in the modern world since it provides reliable
information for use in enhancing the quality of services and care. The lack of
research in nursing and clinical research is likely to lead to practices
without validation. Research work helps to evaluate the effectiveness of
certain modalities in practice and also examine the effect of nursing care to
the well being of the patients. For the qualitative research, the design
involves a description of different phenomena and events as they relate to
nursing practice. On the other hand, quantitative research helps to describe
the phenomena by the support of statistical data (Creswell, 2013). According to
many researchers, the use of both methods in research can be beneficial in
increasing validity and reliability.
The approach of using both qualitative and quantitative
techniques in data collection and analysis can be an important endeavor in
nursing research. However, the technicalities of applying the method in nursing
research make it a challenge to use them together. It is evident that the use
of both qualitative and quantitative methods has an added value through
providing a more comprehensive design. There are numerous practical and
theoretical challenges that arise when integrating qualitative and quantitative
research. It is a complex task to handle such research since the various
methods required for the approach do not have a significant focus in the literature
by many researchers. The studies lack publicized data for both the qualitative
and quantitative methods because they use one as a data pilot source. There
exist different audiences, reviewers, and journals for the qualitative and
quantitative derived insights that result in the separate publishing of the
data despite it being from an individual study (Borkan, 2004).
Qualitative and quantitative research methods have
differences in the assumptions, worldview, and epistemology that make actual
integration a reality. Qualitative data relies on different iterative
techniques to generate research data, but quantitative studies use linear
questionnaires or measurements. Qualitative researches do not rely on
statistics and quantification to arrive at conclusions. However, the
quantitative research studies base the arguments on interpretation rather than
discovery. Thus, the researcher seeks for valid and rigorous interpretations
rather than qualitative studies that are inductive, uses observations, and formulation
of hypothesis and theories. Quantitative studies use theories to construct the
hypothesis and then gather data to support them. The approach of integrating
both methods results to a challenge in data handling due to the differences
encountered (Creswell, 2013).
The integration of both qualitative and quantitative
makes the design complex. It takes more time and resources to plan and execute
the requirements of the research. The method also makes it difficult to plan
and implement one method and draw the findings from the other. The
interpretations of the findings are likely to have discrepancies and hence
become a challenge to resolve them. In most instances, the researchers tend to
quantize qualitative data making it lose its flexibility and depth. Qualitative
codes are multi-dimensional while the quantitative codes are one-dimensional
and fixed. The method of converting qualitative data to quantitative is
challenging since it requires analyzing, coding, and integrating it from
unstructured to structured data. The use of the mixed method design is the
statistical measurement limitations of qualitative data when quantized. It
becomes vulnerable to co-linearity (Malina, Nørreklit & Selto, 2011).
However, the researchers can reduce the sample size to reduce time consumption
in the research, but it results in other challenges invalidity.
2. Nursing research is
used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing. Examine a problem you have
seen in nursing. Why should it be studied? Justify your rationale
The main purpose of nursing research is to study a
problem and give supportive data about the position taken in the study. The
select issue in nursing for research is the effectiveness of using garlic in
the management of diabetes mellitus type 2. Diabetes is a chronic disease and
is a cause of death to a significant fraction of the world population. The
disease cannot be cured, but is treated in different ways and successfully. The
treatment varies from one patient to another and depends on the type. Type 1 is
treatable by use of insulin injections and adopting a healthy diet as well as
regular exercise. For type 2 diabetes, the effective treatment method involves
the use of a healthy diet and regular exercise or a combination of a healthy
diet, exercise, and medication. Other patients may also need insulin
injections.
The research topic is appropriate since it seeks to
examine the effectiveness of the consumption of garlic as a non-medical therapy
for diabetes. In essence, the use of medications has certain side effects and
drug reactions that vary among different individuals. The patients may also
encounter challenges in adhering to the medication schedules and also the
required physical exercises. An effective method would be to have a prescription
that is non-medical like consumption of garlic on controlled levels to manage
the disease. Garlic has a modulating effect on the metabolic syndrome and
oxidative stress in diabetic patients. Patients using garlic report increased
metabolic syndromes of hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia and also increase insulin
production (Devon, 2013). The research will provide crucial information about
disease management thereby reducing the mortality rate.
References
Borkan, J. M. (2004).
Mixed Methods Studies: A Foundation for Primary Care Research. Annals of
Family Medicine, 2(1), 4–6.
Creswell, J. W. (2013).
Research design: Qualitative,
quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Sage publications
Devon L.J (2013)
Research shows garlic may be an effective treatment for diabetes and oxidative stress, Report from Natural News
Malina, M. A.,
Nørreklit, H. S., & Selto, F. H. (2011). Lessons learned: advantages and disadvantages of mixed method research. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(1), 59-71.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in custom nursing essay writing services services if you need a similar paper you can place your order for college essay writing services.
No comments:
Post a Comment