The Insider Movie Review
The American
drama film gets based on a true story of a 60 minutes segment concerning
Jeffrey Wigand that first got aired on the CBS news program 60 minutes. Jeffrey
Wigand gained recognition as a whistleblower in the tobacco industry when he
appeared on the program on February 4, 1996. On the program, Wigand claimed
that there was a conspiracy by Brown & Williamson to increase the amount of
nicotine in cigarette smoke by intentionally manipulating its tobacco blend.
The interview was however not initially aired after Brown & Williamson
successfully pressured CBS News to cancel the broadcast. It later got
broadcasted after The Wall Street Journal published their version of Wigand’s
claims.
The events of
this real life white collar crime got portrayed in the 1999 movie the insider
directed by Michael Mann. The crime
is when a cigarette manufacturing company by the name Brown & Williamson
increases the amount of nicotine in cigarette smoke so as to make them more
addictive to tobacco smokers. The company executes this crime intentionally
with the aim of making more sales thus huge profits. The manufacturing company
does not put into consideration the adverse health impacts of excessive
nicotine in cigarette smoke. The negative consequences of nicotine include
chest pain, difficulty in breathing, muscle twitching, depression, dizziness,
nausea, vomiting, panic attacks, coma, and convulsions. The most common side
effects of nicotine include hiccups, nausea, jaw soreness, ulcers,
light-headedness, gastrointestinal distress, decreased appetite, and dizziness
(DuPont, 1991).
The main
character in this American Drama film is Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, who is an
executive employee of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company, however, gets
fired as the movie starts. Jeffrey Wigand is the whistleblower who claimed that
his former company Brown & Williamson was intentionally altering the
nicotine content in their products. Wigand, who is a doctor of biochemistry,
had got hired by Brown & Williamson Company to research on a better approach
to delivering nicotine to minimizing the negative impact of other tobacco
compounds (Ebert, 1999). Wigand, however, disagreed with the company’s
management including with CEO Thomas Sandefur; hence resulting to him getting
fired. Wigand had initially refused to have any discussion about any tobacco
company due to a corporate confidentiality agreement that he had signed.
However, Wigand and his family soon receive death threats and Wigand agrees to
reveal the whole story. In an interview, Wigand claims that Brown &
Williamson Company intentionally modifies the content of nicotine in the
cigarettes they produce. Wigand also accuses the CEO of Brown & Williamson
Company Thomas Sandefur of giving false information to a committee of the
Congress. Another character of the film is Lowell Bergman, who is a producer of
CBS News for the program 60 minutes. Bergman started investigating the
tobacco-related story a long time before Wigand was fired, and was the one who
contacted Wigand so that he could assist him in translating some leaked
technical documents related to the tobacco story. Bergman interviewed Wigand
for the 60 minutes CBS program; however, the airing of the story received
numerous objections from the management of the CBS News. Liane Wigand is the wife
of Jeffrey Wigand and flees with the children after receiving several death
threats. Don Hewitt is the creator and executive producer of the CBS News
program 60 minutes and gets summoned together with Bergman and Mike Wallace.
Wallace was a regular correspondent of the program 60 minutes. After Caperlli,
the legal counsel for CBS News and Kluster, the CBS News president had disputed
the original Wigand’s interview, Wallace and Hewitt agreed to edit the
interview. Bergman, however, was substantially opposed to that decision. Eric
Kluster is the president of CBS News. Kluster was responsible for the initial
omission of Wigand’s interview for the 60 minutes segment. Richard Scruggs is a
private attorney hired to represent the State of Mississippi in a lawsuit
against thirteen tobacco manufacturing industries for state-borne healthcare
costs. In the lawsuit, they were seeking for a reimbursement of Medicaid
expenses incurred in the treatment of diseases related to smoking. Scruggs got
contacted in the film by Bergman to assist in legal concerns. Jack Palladino is
a private investigator and attorney who got engaged in counter-investigation
against the revelation made by Wigand. Helen Caperelli is the legal counsel for
CBS News. Caperelli invoked a legal theory referred to as tortuous interference
in which any person who makes another person break a legal agreement is liable
to get charged for interference.
The crime got
discovered after Wigand the former executive of the Brown & Williamson
Company, revealed the illegal activities committed by the company on a CBS News
program in an interview with Bergman. Wigand made the claims after his family,
and he received several death threats. The discovery of the crime resulted in a
series of lawsuits. Wigand got sued by the Brown & Williamson Company for
theft, fraud as well as breach of contract. The Company also launched a
500-page smear campaign against Wigand. The case, however, dropped after the
settlement of the tobacco industry with the states in 1997 (Capaldi, 2005).
There was also the leaking of Wigand’s depositions at the Mississippi and
Kentucky state courts resulting in their publication by the Wall Street
Journal. It also led to the airing of Wigand’s original interview with CBS
News. The tobacco industry also got sued by several states and settlement
totaling to millions of dollars got agreed on. The Food Drug and Administration
entity also got into a lawsuit against Brown & Williamson Company seeking
the regulatory power over tobacco products. The Court of Appeals ruled that
Food Drug and Administration dad no jurisdiction to regulate tobacco products
(Ruger Theodore, 2010).
The unlawful
actions in the movie signify the widespread greed for money by the Brown &
Williamson Company. The desire gets entirely based on the greed for money as
well as arrogance. The company committed the crime with the aim of increasing
sales and marinating tremendous profitability. The company ignored all the
adverse consequences their products would have on users in the greed for money.
The company also ignored the research conducted by Dr. Jeffrey Wigand as well
as his recommendations which aimed at improving tobacco additives. The reason
cited by the corporation for not implementing his findings and recommendations
was due to they would result in decreased sales.
In discussing if
the propensity to engage in unlawful conduct systemic; that is, is it inherent
in a competitive, free-enterprise economic system in a society oriented toward
the individual Or was criminal behavior caused solely by bad apples, rogue
employees whose character flaws led them to cheat and steal? In the movie “The
Insider” the criminal activity that occurred got orchestrated by a few
individuals who got pushed by the greed for money. The managers of the company
cheated due to their want of money, and they're uncaring and disrespectful
character towards public health.
References
Capaldi, N. (2005). Business and Religion: A Clash
of Civilizations?. M & M Scrivener Press.
DuPont, R. L. (1991). The Clinical Management of
Nicotine Dependence. JAMA, 266(22), 3202-3203.
Ebert, R. (1999). The Insider. Chicago Sun-Times, 5,
99.
Ruger Theodore, W. (2010). FDA v. Brown and
Williamson: The Norm of Agency Continuity.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in cheap essay writing service if you need a similar paper you can place your order for legitimate essay writing service.
No comments:
Post a Comment